Last Saturday my friends and I joined the protest against the Slave Trade in Libya. We kept repeating ourselves in such disbelief “I can’t believe we are protesting about *this* in 2017”. Despite the weather reaching 0 degrees at some points the turnout and solidarity was warming. I will say this though, it was disappointing to see a real lack of diversity of people at the march. I’ve been on several marches, Black Lives Matter, Women’s March, Anti-Austerity and Student Fees and there was more diversity at those marches then on Saturday. Why? Now this *could* be down to lack of awareness or promotion (gives side eye). If so, we should question why this modern day slavery is not in mainstream news. However, the turnout to me symbolising a lack of genuine allieship/ solidarity when it comes to black issues- black issues or slogans that aren’t as “cool” as #BlackLivesMatter.
Slavery in countries like Libya is not a black issue nor is it an African issue, it’s a global issue and there should be a global outcry.
This is why I’m so pleased to see the Libya Slave Trade petition to the UK Government exceeded the requirement to not only receive a formal response from the Government but for there to be a debate. There will be a Westminster Hall debate on Monday 18th 4:30pm.
I’ll be honest I wasn’t that impressed with Government’s response this morning. I may come back to this in another post. However, we have four days to put pressure on MPs, Minsters, political advisers to listen to our outcry.
Here is what you can do right now to ensure the debate at Westminster Hall is meaningful and will hold the UK Government to account:
1. Write/tweet/email to your Member of Parliament asking them if they will be attending the debate on Monday.
2. Ask your MP how they plan to keep the UK Government accountable.
Those in stuck in slavery don’t need 650 MPs sharing how sad and disgusted they are. They need action and they need it now.
3. Attend the debate
Attend the debate on behalf of those we are advocating for. Let Parliament and the press know this is a huge issue, that we are watching and we want action. (I unfortunately will be in Geneva preparing to speak at the UN about online abuse but will be watching online and tweeting loads.)
(Shout out to a great friend of mine Audrey. We had a discussion about what we can do to support those stuck in slavery including writing to our MPs. Audrey then sent a wicked (good wicked) email so I’ve based this template email on one sent on Sunday)
Dear [insert MPs name],
I hope you are well.
My name is ____ and I live ___ and I’m writing about the recent coverage of the Libya slave trade.
Like many, I was shocked and upset to see the plight of many human beings that are being sold into a slave trade in 2017. I attended the recent demonstration march outside of the Libyan Embassy and was struck by how many people, just like me were disgusted by the treatment of human beings in Libya and wanted to do something.
I have since found out that there is a debate in parliament on the 18th December at 4.30pm and was hoping that you would be attending to stand up and condemn what is currently happening. I would also like to find out, in light of what is going on, what the British government will be doing to pressure the Libyan government to take action.
It is not lost on me, that as shocking as this new revelation is, modern slavery still very much exists all over the world and I would really like see this debate shine a light on this and more importantly what we as a nation are doing to safeguard the vulnerable and punish the employers that are profiting from this practice.
It would be great to have a further conversation about what your party are doing in particular to address modern slavery in the U.K.
One of Glitch!UK’s fundamental principles and ways of working is partnership. We believe working in partnership with great organisations, activists and survivors is key to amplifying our collective voice, increasing our impact and to avoid duplicating work.
One of their manifesto directives is about eradicating online violence, and it was through discussions of online violence that synergies between us developed. There was a particular resonance around viewing online violence as something that is wrong with the internet but that can be solved. For the Feminist Internet online abuse is seen as a virus; for Glitch!UK we see it as a temporary malfunction, an online glitch.
We recently collaborated on the Feminist Internet Digital Clinic, an event and panel discussion at Somerset House Studios on 4th December. We sold out tickets a week before the night, which shows how much interest there is in this topic! The Feminist Internet Digital Clinic was about helping to fight back and initiate a healing process. Discussions focused on empowering attendees to become antibodies to take actions that can neutralise the infection of online harassment.
Before the panel discussion and Q&A there were presentations from UAL students and New York artist Caroline Sinders on different forms of online abuse, as well as their causes and impact.
Panelists: Travis Alabanza, Azmina Dhrodia from Amnesty International, myself Seyi representing Glitch!UK and Dr Charlotte Webb from Feminist Internet as Chair. This was by far one of the most diverse group of panelists I’ve been involved with.
Glitch!UK had its first interactive stall where antibodies (attendees) could sign pledges and provide recommendations to how social media platforms can fix the glitch.
It was clear during and after The Feminist Internet Digital Clinic that there was a real need to discuss this topic further and continue empowering people to become antibodies and fixers.
We want to continue the Glitch!UK and Feminist Internet collaboration and The Feminist Internet Digital Clinic on tour around the UK and particularly around Universities. We’re also keen to develop a concept that allows those that haven’t experienced online abuse and harassment to see, feel what it’s like, maybe through virtual reality.
If you’re interested in supporting this collaboration and or booking The Feminist Internet Digital Clinic please do get in touch.
“Which STD will end your miserable life?” “This is why monkeys don’t belong here.” “I hope you get lynched”. These are just some of the many messages Seyi Akiwowo, a Labour councillor in Newham, told me she has been sent over the past three weeks. Akiwowo has received reams of violent and racist abuse after a video of her suggesting former empires pay reparations to countries they once colonised (and whose resources they still continue to plunder) went viral. She doesn’t expect everyone to agree with her, she said, but people seem to think they’re entitled to hurl abuse at her because she’s a black woman.
The particular intensity of misogyny directed at black women is so commonplace that it was given a name by academic Moya Bailey: misogynoir. This was highlighted recently when Diane Abbott, the country’s first and most-well known black woman MP and current shadow Home secretary, spoke out about the violent messages she’s received and continues to receive. The messages are so serious that Abbott’s staff often fear for her safety. There is an implicit point in abuse like this: women of colour, in particular black women, should know their place. If they dare to share their opinions, they’ll be attacked for it… Read more here
Today is Human Rights Day a day observed by all around the world to commemorate the 10th December 1948, the date when the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The right to freedom of expression is granted to all under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and to all EU Citizens Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights. We believe you can express an opinion on topics and issues around the world without it being filled with hate or it be a personal attack.
It is possible have a robust and heated debate without descending to online abuse and harassment. Robust debate is necessary in order to get to the core of the main points, challenge held beliefs and draw similarities and conclusion. It is important to go through this process in order for society to grow in tolerance and understanding, to evolve and recommit to core beliefs.
Freedom of expression is not a human right to spread any form of hate nor should it ever be.
Amnesty International commissioned an Ipsos Mori poll which showed 23% of women across eight countries experienced online abuse or harassment. Just over a fifth of women in Britain experienced online abuse and it is magnified for women of colour. There is an increasing number of attempts to silence women and individuals from diverse groups online through various forms abuse, ranging from but not limited to revenge porn, doxing, harassment and mob-style trolling. These are activists, politicians, journalists, models, bloggers, mums, senior leaders in companies and the future generation. This results in the withdrawal from expressing an opinion online out of fear of a violation of privacy and or safety and therefore a limitation of diversity online.
This is a new challenge to democracy, digital inclusion, progress towards gender equality, as well as the integrity of the information space that social media companies and governments must address and quickly. Maybe we should have the right to take social media companies to court for failing to address online abuse and harassment online?
There are some things that are just clearly hateful and do not belong in robust debate. Sending racist abuse, rape threats and sharing a video without someone’s consent are clear red lines. Once we tackle this, then we can turn our attention to the remarks that are not so clear cut.
As with all rights there comes responsibility. When it comes to the right to express yourself the responsibility must be to be respectful, tolerant, and not to spread hate. If you agree, sign up our Glitch!UK Pledge.
We ask The Conservative Party, The Labour Party, The Liberal Democrats, The Green Party and the Women’s Equality Party to recognise online abuse & harassment as a form of violence against women and demand better self-regulation from social media companies. Who will say yes first?
We urge the political parties to include educational training workshops as part of their manifesto commitments.
We need training for young people so they can understand what online abuse means and how they can act as good citizens. This should be extended for those who work with young people so they can spot the signs – rather than just issuing bans on phones and websites in schools.
We must train online tech companies and those developing apps and social media platforms. They must learn from the mistakes of current social media companies. There are current attempts to fix the online abuse glitch but new platforms should not have these glitches in the first place.
“Social media has been a powerful ally for women in the past month. The online outcry about sexual harassment shocked the world into seeing abuse towards women as distressingly commonplace. In this instance, Twitter served as an empowering space – it provided solidarity and an encouraging environment where women could break their silence. It can achieve a tremendous amount of good.
We must not forget, however, that social media is also a toxic enabler. The inequality and violence that women still face in our society is often replicated within these online communities. Charlie Brooker may have exaggerated the deadly power of Twitter in a horrifying episode of Black Mirror but the capability of social media to enable violence is a frighteningly real issue.”
…”By allowing online abuse to continue on this scale, we risk a generation of women who refuse to challenge the status quo in order to preserve their mental health. Criado Perez urges women subject to online abuse to try their best to keep going.
“These threats come from a place of fear. These men are scared of our voices. The only way to get over this is to keep speaking up until women speaking in the public sphere is so normal, it’s no longer seen as a threat.”
… “East London politician Seyi Akiwowo had a similar experience of unsolicited abuse in response to an online video of her speech at the European Parliament. She explains the emotional impact of the misogynistic and racial abuse.
“I was so overwhelmed by it all. Looking back, even though I went into fighter mode, wellbeing wise – I wasn’t okay. It was obvious that the harassment affected me which is surprising because I have always been a big believer in the saying ‘sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me.’ This is so not true. Words hurt and hateful words lead to hateful action,” she says.
In 2011, Copenhagen student Emma Holten awoke to her private naked photos and personal information uploaded onto the internet for the world to see. The images were distributed across multiple websites and she received hundreds of sexually explicit threats. Holten tells The Overtake about her mental health following the distressing experience.”
Earlier this year I received a wave of hateful online abuse and harassment after a video of me speaking at the European Parliament went viral. On one hand, the online world is merely a reflection of the state of our society; on the other hand the online world seems to be a comfortable place for those who know they cannot behave in such a way elsewhere.
My experience is sadly not uncommon and is an indication of how far society has to go to achieve true equality.
That’s why I founded Glitch! UK, an organisation aiming to end online hate speech and online violence against women and girls (OVAWG). Glitch believes that online violence of all forms is a vehicle to divide society and spread fear. Glitch means a temporary malfunction. This glitch of online abuse can of course be fixed and, when we look back on this period of time, we want to be able to say that the rise in online violence and hate speech was only a “glitch” in our history.
Through Glitch, we lobby social media companies to do more to stop online abuse. We have developed a set of recommendations for those firms and we are delivering training workshops for young people. In 2018 will be training online tech companies too.
Earlier this year Diane Abbott, shadow home secretary and Britain’s first black female MP, spoke out about the online abuse she receives on a daily basis. The abuse is so serious that her staff try not to let her out alone. Sadly, Abbott is not the only MP to receive online abuse, Yvette Cooper, Jess Philips, Tulip Siddiq and David Lammy are only a few of the name names on this list.
In September Amnesty International provided more evidence of the problem. Abbott received almost half (45.14 per cent) of all abusive tweets in the run up to the election. Excluding her, black and Asian women MPs in Westminster received 35 per cent more abusive tweets than white women MPs. Online abuse cuts across party lines, however.
A week later MPs debated abuse and intimidation during the election campaign. Online abuse does not just stop with those in elected office. We have unfortunately seen a rise in online abuse and harassment among party members. Labour’s national executive committee (NEC) agreed to toughen up the party’s stance on internet abuse and published a new social media code of conduct.
In order to end online violence against all women and girls there needs to be a global movement of activists, organisations, policy-makers, individuals, law enforcement and social media companies raising awareness of the issues of online abuse and working to fix this glitch. There’s also a need for mobilising and working in partnership with other organisations, activists and survivors to amplify our voices, increase our impact and avoid duplication.
That is why after Everyday Sexism’s Laura Bates email introduced me to Azmina Dhrodia, Researcher, Technology and Human Rights at Amnesty and her research assignment into online abuse and harassment I was more than willing to help where I can. There was some initial hesitation because who wants to receive a storm of abuse twice in a lifetime let alone twice in a year. However, my experience is an example of the experience many women particularly women of colour face online and it’s a story that doesn’t get heard too often. Therefore I felt the responsibility to bring context to the research.
Amnesty International commissioned an IPSOS MORI poll which looked at the experiences of women between the ages of 18 and 55 in Denmark, Italy, New Zealand, Poland, Spain, Sweden, the UK and USA.
23% of the women surveyed across these eight countries said they had experienced online abuse or harassment at least once, ranging from 16% in Italy to 33% in the US. 22% of women in the UK experienced online abuse one or more times. Online violence & abuse magnified for women from ethnic minority backgrounds.
Online abuse has a silencing or censoring effect on women with more than 3/4 (76%) of women across the eight countries who had experienced abuse or harassment on social media making some changes to the way they use social media platformsas a result.
Online abuse can manifest in different ways including threats of violence, privacy violations or sexist and misogynistic comments. Of women polled who had experienced online abuse or harassment, more than a quarter (26%) said they had received threats of physical or sexual assault
Online abuse can have a serious psychological impact with women reporting stress, anxiety or panic attacks as well as lower self-esteem as a result of the abuse. Around two-thirds of women who had experienced abuse or harassment online in the UK (67%) stated a feeling of apprehension when thinking about using the internet or social media.
In the UK 90% of women agree that online abuse is harmful to women. These responses show that for so many women around the world, the internet is simply not a safe space.
The psychological implications of experiencing online abuse remains under-researched, and as a result, understated. There is a misconception that because the abuse is online it can simply be ignored or shrugged off. However, in the UK and US, more than 3 times as many woman disagree (63% and 61%) than agree (19% in both countries) that online abuse and harassment can be stopped by just ignoring it.
The assumption that online abuse is not ‘real’ also fails to consider the myriad of harms caused by online violence and abuse that ultimately contributes to women being silenced and denied their right to freely express themselves online.
Dr. Emma Short, a Psychologist and Reader in Cyber Psychology at the University of Bedfordshire, talked to me about the impact of online abuse. She explained,
“I think the impact of online abuse is greater because your victimization is broadcast for everyone to see. It’s often joined by a third party so the crowd or pack is going after you. So, very quickly, it feels as though the whole world is after you. There might be positive tweets, you might have lots of friends on the outside, but if the crowd has turned against you and is after you, it feels like the world wishes you harm.”
Almost 1/3, or 32%, of the women polled who use Facebook stated that the company’s response to dealing with abuse or harassment online was inadequate.
Twitter did not fare much better. Almost 30% of women polled who are Twitter users stated the company’s response to abuse or harassment was inadequate, including 43% of women users in the UK.
So what next?
Research like this is important as it provides evidence of the online violence millions of women are facing. It is therefore important for policy-makers and social media companies to support, invest and respond to the research.
Women like Laura Bates Founder of Everyday Sexism and Pamela Merritt Co-Founder of Reproaction have shared their experiences, organisation such as Amnesty International, Plan International and NSPCC have provided great research and statistics to support these experiences, so what is going to happen next? How will social media companies and governments action on this compelling research?
We need to immediately acknowledge that that language matters, words are powerful and hateful words can be used to mobilise against a group of people. Therefore, we must challenge the rhetoric of “oh it’s just words, ignore them” by instead saying “no words do have an impact and negative online activity can and does extend into real world.” Social media companies must be held more accountable and be transparent with how they self-regulate and enforce their own rules.
As we embark on International Day of the Elimination of Violence Against Women on 25th November Government leaders, organisations and activists officially acknowledge Online Violence Against Women and Girls (OVAWG). The UK Government should lead the way in combating OVAWG.
We need specific educational training workshops, for young people so they can understand what online abuse means, it’s impact and how they can be better online citizens. Training workshops for those that work with and look after young people is also required to help them spot the signs rather than just banning website and phones in schools. Instead teachers, parents, carers and those that work with young people need support in order to provide young people with the tools to be able to help young people be better online citizens.
There needs to be training workshops for local police officers so they are supporting those that willing to report and take action against online abuse and harassment. I’m pleased that in April this year, Sadiq Khan launched the Online Hate Crime Hub. My online abuse case was escalated to one of the fantastic Detective Inspectors who managed my case diligently. These key skills need to be shared to those front line police officers like those that manage our local police stations.
Finally, but by no means least, we must train online tech companies and those developing new apps and social media platforms. They must learn from the mistakes and glitches of current social media platforms. There are current attempts to fix the online abuse glitch within these sites and apps but moving forward we should have new apps and new social media platforms that don’t have these glitches in the first place.
Finally but by no means least, we must train online tech companies and those developing new apps and social media platforms. They must learn from the mistakes and glitches of current social media platforms. What this research, campaigns and Community Guidelines reform attempt to fix the online abuse glitch within these sites and apps. Moving forward we should aim to have apps and new social media platforms that don’t have these glitches in the first place.
By Azmina Dhrodia, Researcher, Technology and Human Rights
At Amnesty, we’ve been investigating the extent of online abuse against women MPs active on Twitter in the UK through individual interviews and by using machine learning to detect abusive tweets sent to women MPs. The findings outlined in this post provide a detailed look at abuse on Twitter in the run-up to the 2017 election — in which Diane Abbott’s case stands out for all the wrong reasons.
The online abuse she and other women MPs experience sits in a wider context of pervasive and damaging attacks against women from all walks of life on social media platforms. For the last eight months I’ve been speaking to journalists, activists, bloggers, comic book writers, comedians and women active in all levels of politics and public life to hear about their experiences of abuse on social media platforms. I’ve had numerous long chats with women in cafés, parks, hotel lobbies, at youth centres or via Skype, and each time I hear the same message. Twitter can be a scary place for women online. Whether women use social media platforms as public figures or for personal use, the threat of abuse is all too real and it is having a silencing effect on women’s participation online and in the public sphere.