I chose Tramadol Night by Distant Ramblings on the Horizon as the ‘Reblog of the week’!
I really admire the personal anecdote and how the story appropriately supports his argument for a balance between evidence/protocol and individual/personalised learning.
Extract from the Independent Article: “Pupils from state schools and ethnic minority groups need higher A-level results than those from private schools to get into Britain’s top universities, says a study out today.”
In my opinion, this is not news nor is it current affairs. This has been happening for years and from personal experience I was one of the few in my course at LSE that went to a state school.
Dr Wendy Piatt makes a valid point in regards to A Level choices individual students make. However, I hope Wendy is not insinuating that it is the fault of that individual student.
From personal experience and I would like to hear from others too, I was not told that my GCSE subject options will affect which A Levels I can choose which in turn affects what University and degree and I can apply for also.
When there are below standard career guidance in state schools how can the blame fall on the child?
When schools are forced to focus on helping their students pass non-creative, production line exams tests, students are not prepared or as prepared for post-16 world let alone the real world.
Yes, it is a serious problem that Universities especially the really good ones are not accepting students from state schools and ethnic minorities. It is also a serious problem that the gap between ethnic minority students and white students accepted to good Universities is still substantially wide!
How can it be addressed: (In my opinion)
1- Career guidance coaches in all state schools with focus primarily on schools that are below average on school league tables.
These coaches are not only to work with the students but parents and teachers. Collaboration is key and necessary here in order to be effective and efficient. Involving parents means a continuation of a ‘what’s next ethos’ and encourages more critical thinking at home. Involving teachers, can bring academic learning to life, how learning quotes from Romeo & Juliet, or how to create pretty colours from different metals & acid is relevant to everyday life and the future.
2- Curriculum needs to be rebuilt on a foundation that education is for life and not for exams. University is just one option of many but all students should be given the opportunity to go to a great University and be equipped to be able to do well also.
One great quote from the video clip: “In a system that is meant to teach and help the youth, there is no voice from the youth at all.” This is sadly very true about many education systems.
Following on from my previous post Sir Ken Robinson: Changing Education Paradigms, the innovative and effective self-directed learning or Independent projects could be one mode of reforming education for the 21st Century.
With youth unemployment at an all-time high worldwide, it is seriously time to question all education systems and practices. Unfortunately too many education systems are based on what Sir Ken calls a “production line” mentality. Where we enter a system that should produce educated, enlightened and employable young people. We can see that these production line systems are failing to achieve this: a significant increase in early school leavers, low-skilled and under-educated young people, and high youth unemployment.
Why is this production line education system failing?
I completely agree with Sir Ken, education systems are built for a particular purpose and for period of history when society was a lot less complicated and homogenous.There are thousands of new job positions today that did not exist three years ago and Millions more compared to 50-60 years ago, our schools, curriculum and standardised teaching methods evidently cannot not keep up.
We are in desperate need of an education system that both educates individuals holistically for life and in preparation for the labour market.We need radical but effective education reforms that challenges pre-conceptions of education.
An incredibly well-balanced and informative article on the topic, profit-making schools.
An excerpt from Simon Burgess: “So profit-making is pointless at best: under the current market set-up, improvements in attainment would not make money (so would not happen) with profit-making schools, and cutting costs would make money but would either reduce attainment or leave it unchanged…..Profit making in schools would either solve all schools’ problems nor signal the end of civilisation; the issue provokes strong feelings, but largely misses what should be the central policy concerns. Big gains in levels of attainment depend on raising average teacher effectiveness and big gains in equity depend on weakening the importance of proximity as an admissions rule and on changing the allocation of effective teachers across schools. None of these would be strongly or directly affected by for-profit schools. However, there are certainly merits in piloting policies that link school’s revenue per student to the progress of that student, and incentivising cost reductions through keeping the surplus in the school.”